I hope it doesn’t escape anyone that the lawsuit that has been filed by the Attorney General of Texas asking the Supreme Court to basically overturn the results of the presidential elections by throwing our millions of mail-in ballots is not alleging ‘wide spread’ voting fraud. Instead, it is arguing that the rules instituted in these four battle ground states to enable voter access during the pandemic are unconstitutional. The reason they are not alleging fraud is because in over 50 lawsuits, the Trump campaign has not been able to provide any credible evidence to support their allegations. The lawsuit by Texas is an implicit acknowledgement of the face that there was no voter fraud. Hence, they are attacking the voting processes that are used in other states in a specious argument that this harmed Texas – because Texas didn’t like the results, i.e., Joe Biden won in those states.
The hope for all of those that have signed on to this lawsuit is that the Supreme Court will hear the case and side with Texas and basically disenfranchise millions of voters in the four states named in this suit and toss out their legally cast votes. It is hard to imagine that the Supreme Court would want to put itself into the position of being the body that overturned an election in which 7 million people showed a preference for Biden over Trump. As I have stated before, there is no doubt a decision in favor of Texas and Trump would plunge this country into a constitutional crisis and potential civil war. The Republicans obviously don’t care about such concepts as ‘democracy’ and ‘the peaceful transfer of power.’ They only care about power – getting it, keeping it and exercising it.
If the Supreme Court were to overturn the results of this election then there is a silver lining, so to speak. In the future, both parties and every state could save millions of dollars in long drawn-out campaigns and preparing for complicated elections by just asking the Supreme Court to pick a new president every four years. We could all go on about our lives and not have to spend months listening to and watching political ads on TV, many of which are filled with lies and propaganda. We could rest secure in the knowledge that the wise justices sitting on the Supreme Court would have the best interest of all Americans in mind when they made their presidential selection every four years. If they found a candidate they really liked, they could probably figure out a way to circumvent the current Constitution regarding term limits for president and we could have a president for life such as in China, Russia and my favorite, Belarus. Great, let’s just save all of ourselves a lot of stress and let the Supreme Court select our presidents.!!
Although I didn’t post anything on this blog yesterday, I did write a Letter to the Editor of the Chronical when I heard that Montana had joined this ridiculous and dangerous lawsuit filed by Texas. I don’t know if it will be published, but the full text is below. I ask once again, what the hell has this country become? Every day that passes with Trump still in the White House, we look more and more like a third world banana republic.
Letter to the Editor
It is an absolute travesty that Montana joined the other Republican led states in filing the amicus brief to the Supreme Court to overturn the results of the presidential election. This is nothing short of a frontal assault on democracy. I thought this was the land of ‘states rights’, ‘Montana values’, ‘smaller government’, where politicians continuously rail against ‘judicial activism. The Trump campaign has lost something like 50 lawsuits because they have been unable to present any evidence of wide spread voter fraud that would stand up in court. So, in the face of no evidence, Montana and the other members of this ridiculous lawsuit are asking the Supreme Court to just overturn the results of the election. If that is not judicial activism I sure as hell don’t know what is. This whole lawsuit brought by Texas is attacking the voting laws and procedures of 4 other states that Trump lost. What happened to ‘states’ rights?’ I wonder how the Montana State legislature would like it if the attorney general of Nebraska tried to file a lawsuit with the Supreme Court alleging that Montanans were doing it all wrong and they should be forced to do things the way they are done in Nebraska. My guess is, the Montana folks would not take kindly to that. So why the hell do we think we have the right to intervene in the election processes in other states just because we don’t like the results? Obviously, all of the words tossed so easily around by Montana politicians like ‘states’ rights’, ‘Montana values’, ‘judicial activism’, and ‘court packing’ are just useful as campaign slogans. Regardless of what the Supreme Court does, the stain on Montana’s integrity won’t fade easily. Let’s hope democracy survives.